Skip to main content

Who is paying for the Tariffs? China or the US Consumer?


Who is paying for the Tariffs? China or the US Consumer?



We present a counterfactual (i.e., what might have been if the tariffs were not in place) analysis of the impact of tariffs imposed on China by the Trump administration, starting in February 2018. If you want to skip straight to the results, scroll down to the charts and the green curve towards the end represents the estimated price of the goods in the absence of tariffs. The maximum percentage difference between our estimate and the actual price is also marked in the charts.

Brief background of the Synthetic Control Method


The analysis is done using the Synthetic Controls method pioneered by Abadie et. al., and which I have recently started extending with colleagues at MIT. A more detailed explanation of the technique can be found here, but the basic idea is to analyze the impact of a "treatment unit" by creating a synthetic version of the treatment unit using a combination of untreated units, and then compare the behavior of the treatment unit post the intervention with the behavior of the synthetic version, which has not undergone treatment, i.e. the "counterfactual". The reason you can build a model of the treatment unit from other units is the assumption that there is correlation between those units. For instance the price of one commodity is affected by factors like gas prices, seasonal demand, consumer confidence etc., and those same factors (or some combination) affect prices of other commodities. 

In our analysis here, the "intervention" is the application of tariffs in February 2018, shown by the vertical line in all the graphs, and the price data is obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data is from January 2010 to July 2019 and includes 328 separate categories. The prices are relative prices with the 1984 price of the corresponding good set as 100. The categories of tariff affected and unaffected goods were obtained from Anthony DeBarros and Josh Zumbrun as a follow up to their WSJ article Despite Reprieve, New Tariffs Will Hit Wide Range of Consumer Goods. The counterfactual curve in all the plots is our estimate of what the price would have been if the tariffs had not been imposed.


Initial findings

Our initial analysis indicates a clear rise in prices paid by consumers as a result of tariffs. We also present a few counterfactuals of tariff unaffected goods, as an example of placebos where no such clear trend of rise in prices can be observed. 

Caveats: 

  1. This is a very quick and initial analysis of data, for a detailed economic model and analysis please look at the paper The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on U.S. Prices and Welfare by Amiti, Redding and Weinstein. Our analysis is generally supportive of their conclusions.
  2. Our analysis does not study and draws no conclusions on the long term impact of tariffs.

Tariff Affected Goods Counterfactuals







Tariff Unaffected Goods Counterfactuals (placebo)







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The business of ZeroRating

ZeroRating conversations are dominating Network Neutrality issues these days, whether it is the FreeBasics controversy  in India, Binge On by T-Mobile, or Verizon's recent announcement of a plan similar to AT&T's sponsored data. Here are a few thoughts to consider about ZeroRating and why it makes no sense (to me). If ISPs Zero Rate content, somebody has to pay for the bandwidth. Suppose the Content provider pays for it. Then there is a pricing problem: ISPs cannot charge the content provider a price above the price they charge consumers. Suppose they charge consumers X per MB of data, and they charge content providers X+Y per MB of data. Then, for sufficient traffic where overheads are accounted for, it is cheaper  for content providers to send recharge coupons back directly to the customers who used their services. Long term, pricing above the consumer price is not sustainable. ISPs cannot  charge the content provider a price below  the price they cha...
87 comments
Read more

mRSC: A new way to answer What Ifs and do time series prediction

Introduction What if the federal minimum wage is raised to 16 dollars an hour? What if Steve Smith bats at number 5 in the Ashes 2019 instead of number 3? What if Australian style gun laws were implemented in the USA - what would be the impact on gun related violence? What if Eden Hazard attacks today instead of winging in the midfield? "What if?” is one of the favorite questions that occupy minds, from sports fans to policymakers to philosophers. Invariably, there is no one answer to the What ifs and everyone remains convinced in their own alternate realities but a new wave of work has been looking at data-driven approaches to answer (at least a subset of) these What If questions. The mathematical tool of (Robust) Synthetic Control examines these What If questions by creating a synthetic version of reality and explore its evolution in time as a counterfactual to the actual reality. Recently, together with my collaborators Jehangir Amjad (MIT/Google) Devavra...
24 comments
Read more

Half the equation and half the definition

There is a lot of confusion over what constitutes Net Neutrality, so much so that parties fiercely on the opposite side of issues both claim to be for it. As an example,  the current controversy over Free Basics has been between Facebook, whose CEO penned an Op-Ed entitled " Free Basics protects net neutrality ", and on the opposite side of it is a volunteer coalition, SaveTheInternet (STI), whose entire charter is to protect Net Neutrality. As the Op-Ed from the volunteers suggests , the basic contention between Facebook and the volunteers is a different definition of Net Neutrality. While the concept of Net Neutrality was coined by Tim Wu back in 2003, the definition of what constitutes Net Neutrality has been evolving.  Let me walk you through the evolution of the definition that the STI coalition is going with, which is widely accepted and which I have arrived at after years of researching the issue. I will explain why Facebook (amongst countless othe...
1 comment
Read more