Skip to main content

We need an "AppleSim" for Wired Internet

Our work has long argued that competition is the key to an Open Internet, not Network Neutrality regulations. The introduction of AppleSim by Apple on their iPads is a very interesting and important development in that regard. As Apple says in their marketing literature:

So whenever you need it, you can choose the plan that works best for you—with no long-term commitments
Apple's market power (ironically) has ensured that they got 3 of the 4 top wireless carriers in the US to sign on as partners. If you are not happy with the service of a provider, you can easily switch.

Now imagine if a similar situation existed for wired Internet access for consumers. Everyone had the equivalent of an "AppleSim" at home. Say in the form of a router, that can easily connect to different wired Internet providers with the click of a button on a web page. You are not happy with Netflix speed by your provider FIOS? Fine - you switch to Comcast. Your ISP blocks Skype video calls? Fine - switch to an ISP that doesn't and is eager to get your business. It would mean the end of peering disputes like the one we have seen in the past that are a result of the market power of last mile monopolies. ISPs would compete with each other to get your business based on the services they offer and the quality of their connection. Right now, the ISPs seem to be competing with each other in exploiting their last mile monopolies to extract revenue from content providers.

Laying down the infrastructure to make this vision of an "AppleSim" for wired access is something complex and involved and for another day. However the equivalent of a company like Apple with the "market power" to flex their muscle and get ISPs to fall in line are municipalities. Municipal Internet is one way to ensure that there is enough competition at the last mile for consumers. Another closely related approach is what Stockholm has done with stokab, they have created a shared last mile infrastructure that different providers can lease and get to customers. We need to get a similar concept going in the US, on a large scale. That would ensure an Open Internet, not difficult to define and impossible to regulate ideals like "Network Neutrality".

Update:

AT&T has announced that when customers activate their AppleSim using the AT&T network they will lock the SIM. There goes easy switching to different providers. A retrograde step by AT&T and Apple should push back.

Comments

  1. I understand your demand. Actually AppleSim for Wired Internet , you can get from large internet provider
    company.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1XBet
    Betting in India. It can be great to find bsjeon.net the most popular brands, especially ones that 출장안마 offer betting on sports such as football, tennis,  Rating: 1/10 · ‎Review 1xbet login by Riku VihreasaariWhere can I titanium ring find 1xbet?Where 바카라 can I find 1xbet betting?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The business of ZeroRating

ZeroRating conversations are dominating Network Neutrality issues these days, whether it is the FreeBasics controversy  in India, Binge On by T-Mobile, or Verizon's recent announcement of a plan similar to AT&T's sponsored data. Here are a few thoughts to consider about ZeroRating and why it makes no sense (to me). If ISPs Zero Rate content, somebody has to pay for the bandwidth. Suppose the Content provider pays for it. Then there is a pricing problem: ISPs cannot charge the content provider a price above the price they charge consumers. Suppose they charge consumers X per MB of data, and they charge content providers X+Y per MB of data. Then, for sufficient traffic where overheads are accounted for, it is cheaper  for content providers to send recharge coupons back directly to the customers who used their services. Long term, pricing above the consumer price is not sustainable. ISPs cannot  charge the content provider a price below  the price they charge consume

A short tutorial on the Robust Synthetic Control python library, Part 1: counterfactuals

I have posted a couple of blogs on the powerful technique of (multidimensional) Robust Synthetic Control here and here . In this post I will give a short tutorial on how you can use mRSC to perform your own analysis using the python package my collaborator Jehangir has made available on github. This posting will be about counterfactual analysis. We will work with the canonical example of the synthetic control based counterfactual analysis of the impact California's Prop 99 . All the data and code is included in the github repository linked above. I will post the python code as run on a Jupyter Notebook, and the "tslib" library referenced above has been downloaded and is available. Preliminaries: importing the libraries. In [1]: import sys , os sys . path . append ( "../.." ) sys . path . append ( ".." ) sys . path . append ( os . getcwd ()) from matplotlib import pyplot as plt import matplotlib.ticker as ti

mRSC: A new way to answer What Ifs and do time series prediction

Introduction What if the federal minimum wage is raised to 16 dollars an hour? What if Steve Smith bats at number 5 in the Ashes 2019 instead of number 3? What if Australian style gun laws were implemented in the USA - what would be the impact on gun related violence? What if Eden Hazard attacks today instead of winging in the midfield? "What if?” is one of the favorite questions that occupy minds, from sports fans to policymakers to philosophers. Invariably, there is no one answer to the What ifs and everyone remains convinced in their own alternate realities but a new wave of work has been looking at data-driven approaches to answer (at least a subset of) these What If questions. The mathematical tool of (Robust) Synthetic Control examines these What If questions by creating a synthetic version of reality and explore its evolution in time as a counterfactual to the actual reality. Recently, together with my collaborators Jehangir Amjad (MIT/Google) Devavra